17 May. ’89.
Of course the play can be written and adequately, maybe fully, realised in a naturalistic style.
But this nagging idea of Dance (naturalistic dance, dance as metaphor, dance as essential theatre, dance as complete self-expression*) persists. And that distances the play from naturalistic/realistic expression.
If so . . . . .
a) Narrator on psychiatrist’s couch: his early childhood
b) Narrator narrating to audience
c) Kind of Milk-Wood. Eight actors on chairs
[22 May 1989. The question, of course, is who is the play about? Is it about (a) the family? (b) the narrator/I figure? or (c) about both?
If it is about the family, as it seems, they why this narrator figure?]
*Dance as memory – dance as dream-memory, dance as substitute for language, dance as worship. (7 June.)